Several experts in
cyber-security, cyber-intelligence, cyber-warfare and cyber-terrorism gathered
in 2013 at an event entitled “International Regulation of Cyber-Warfare”. The
fact that the current framework of international law is silent on the concept
of cyber-warfare was criticized my many; demanding a regulation of cyber
weapons.
The main question
remains how exactly the law should be applied to cyber operations. Many
referred to the “Tallinn Manual”, created by a group of experts on cyber
security, as a possible option for how international law applies to cyberspace.
In this manual, several factors that play an important role in classifying a
happening in cyberspace as a cyber-attack are elaborated.
Several
difficulties that could arise from applying international law to cyber warfare
were equally discussed. As an example for this, the discrimination between
civilians and combatants was mentioned as being problematic, as this would
require that the attack be carried out against a specific group of IP addresses.
The requirement of combatants wearing a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at
a distance would equally be difficult to meet.
Even so, cyber war
now poses a real threat to national security with rising number of cyber-attacks
carried out by an increasing variety of actors, including hackers, spies,
companies and states.
The experts then
discussed the definition of cyber weapons in order to create the possibility of
applying international law to their use. They mentioned that cyber weapons must
be deployed within the context f a cyber-warfare act, that the purpose of the
cyber-attack must be a physical destruction or damage caused directly or
indirectly and that the means to achieve this outcome have to involve
technological information systems. A cyber weapon is therefore a device of
computer instructions used in a conflict between national or non-national
actors, with the purpose of causing physical damage to people or equipment.
Even though the
event continued with mentions of legal and non-legal nature, underlining the
interest of the participants in a regulation of cyber weapons, no decision on
how law could be applied was made.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen